No such thing as a good hire in the abstract.Read the manifesto
VERSUS

Superposition vs Wellfound

One fills your inbox with applicants. The other finds the people who were never going to apply.

300M+
Profiles read, not posted to
1 of 1
Outreach written per person
Both
Inbound applicants handled too

Inbound and outbound solve different halves of the problem

  • Waiting for the right applicant.
  • Reading 300 CVs.
  • Match scores with no reasoning.
  • Roles that go quiet after week two.

Wellfound is where startup candidates go to look. You post a role, your company profile does the selling, and people who are actively job hunting apply. Their AI matching and autopilot products sit on top of that pool. It is genuinely good at the top of the funnel, and for some roles that pool is enough.

The person you most want is usually not in it. They are three years into building something, not browsing job boards, and the only way you reach them is if somebody writes to them personally about the thing they are working on. That is an outbound search, and it is what the agent does.

The tell is the quality curve. Inbound gives you volume on day one that thins out fast. Outbound is slower to start and keeps producing, because the pool is everyone who could do the job rather than everyone currently looking.

How they fit together

01

Keep the job post

Nothing about running an agent stops you posting on Wellfound or anywhere else. Applicants can flow into the same pipeline and get read the same way.

02

The agent works the other 95 percent

It reads personal sites, GitHub, papers and talks to find people with the specific experience you asked for, then writes to each one about their own work.

03

Every candidate gets a written reason

Not a match score. A paragraph on why this person fits your requirements, with the evidence, so you can argue with it.

04

The same agent handles what comes back

Replies answered in context, your screening questions asked, interviews booked and recorded. Inbound applicants get the same treatment.

Side-by-side

Compare the workflow, not just the feature list.

Feature
Superposition
Wellfound
Where candidates come from
The open web, found and approached directly
People browsing and applying on the platform
Reaches people not job hunting
Yes, that is the point
Only if they are on the platform
Who writes the outreach
The agent, per person, from your mailbox
You, or an automated message from the platform
Screening
Replies answered and your questions asked in thread
You review applications
Interview scheduling
Booked, chased and recorded
Your own tools
Cost shape
Flat monthly per agent, plus success fee on base
Subscription and placement products, priced per role
Best for
Roles where the right person is not looking
Roles with a large, active applicant pool

Pricing and features checked 21 September 2026. Tell us if something is out of date.

Questions.
Answered.

No. Keep the post running. Inbound is cheap and occasionally excellent. The agent covers the people who would never see it.

Yes. Applicants are read against the same requirements and get the same screening and scheduling as sourced candidates.

No. Each message is written from something the person actually did, and the agent answers whatever comes back rather than dropping them into a sequence.

The agent starts reading the same day as intake, and the first written candidate reads usually land within a few days.

Reach the ones who never applied.

Tell us the role and we will show you three people the agent would write to first.