No such thing as a good hire in the abstract.Read the manifesto
HIRE

Hire an Infrastructure Engineer

The person who makes the platform boring, on purpose.

Whole
System, not one slice
3am
Where the real evidence is
Written
Reasoning per candidate

Owning infrastructure and administering it are different jobs

  • Retained recruiters.
  • LinkedIn Recruiter seats.
  • Keyword-matched resumes.
  • Templated InMails.

At a large company, infrastructure work is a slice: one team owns the mesh, another the pipelines, another the cost. People do excellent work inside a system somebody else designed.

At a startup the job is the whole thing. Build and deployment, observability, on-call, cost, the migration nobody wants to do, and the judgement call about which of those actually matters this quarter.

The two look the same on a CV. Both say Kubernetes, Terraform, AWS. Only one of them has decided what to build and then lived with it at 3am.

How the agent runs an infrastructure engineer search

01

It reads for ownership at 3am

Postmortems they wrote, migrations they ran and documented, talks about an outage. Evidence of consequences, not just tooling.

02

It credits scale honestly

Someone who ran a small system end to end is often a better startup hire than someone who owned one slice of a huge one. The write-up says which they are.

03

Outreach about the actual mess

Infrastructure engineers respond to specifics: what is running, what hurts, what you want gone. Vague scale claims get ignored.

04

Screening on judgement

Your questions go out early: what they chose not to build, and the cheapest fix they made that saved the most pain.

Questions.
Answered.

At startup scale these overlap heavily. The agent searches all three and reads for the same underlying thing: has this person owned production end to end.

Usually not. Judgement about what to build transfers better than familiarity with a particular scale, and people from very large systems sometimes over-build for a startup.

Say it is a priority at intake and the agent weights for evidence of it: cost write-ups, migrations done for spend rather than features.

Yes, and at first-hire scale the overlap is common. We read for both and tell you where someone is thinner.

Find your infrastructure engineer.

Tell us what is running and what hurts. The agent will find people who have fixed it before.